RI
RXO, Inc. (RXO)·Q1 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- RXO delivered Q1 2025 revenue of $1.43B and adjusted EBITDA of $22M, with gross margin at 16.0%; adjusted diluted EPS was $(0.03) while GAAP diluted EPS was $(0.18) as integration and restructuring costs weighed on GAAP results .
- Versus S&P Global consensus, revenue missed by ~$60M and adjusted EPS missed by ~$0.01, while adjusted EBITDA was essentially in line; Q2 guidance calls for adjusted EBITDA of $30–$40M and Brokerage gross margin of 13–15% . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Management raised the Coyote synergy target again to “> $70M” cash synergies, excluding sizable cost-of-purchased-transportation (COPT) opportunities; carrier and coverage operations migrated to a single RXO Connect platform enabling future buy-side savings .
- Key operating positives: 26% LTL brokerage volume growth and 24% Last Mile stop growth; key headwind: automotive, which was a ~$10M gross profit drag year-over-year in Q1 .
- Near-term stock reaction catalysts: raised synergy target and tech integration milestone (buy-side opportunity), alongside conservative Q2 outlook framed by shipper uncertainty and tariff impacts .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- “Carrier and coverage operations are now happening in one system,” unlocking future COPT synergies; synergy target raised to >$70M cash synergies . CEO: “We now expect cash synergies to be more than $70 million... This estimate does not include cost-of-purchased-transportation opportunities, which we expect will be significant.”
- Strong growth in complementary services: Last Mile stops +24% YoY; complementary services gross margin 21.0% (+40 bps YoY) .
- LTL brokerage volume +26% YoY; RXO emphasized AI/ML-driven productivity gains (+17% loads per person per day over the last 12 months) .
What Went Wrong
- Automotive weakness: CFO quantified a ~$10M company-wide gross profit headwind year-over-year; managed expedite automotive volumes pressured Managed Transportation .
- Company gross margin compressed to 16.0% (from 17.4% YoY) and Brokerage gross margin to 13.3%, reflecting buy-rate dynamics and mix, including net revenue accounting for some legacy Coyote fee-based business (reduced reported revenue by ~$35M with no GP/EBITDA impact) .
- Free cash flow conversion was negative on an unadjusted basis (FCF $(17)M) given lower profitability at cycle trough; adjusted FCF $6M (27% conversion), below long-term target 40–60% .
Financial Results
Sequential trend (oldest → newest)
Year-over-year and estimates (Q1 focus)
*Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Segment breakdown (Q1 2025 vs Q1 2024)
KPIs
Non-GAAP impacts: “Transaction, integration, restructuring and other costs, and amortization of intangibles” impacted GAAP EPS by $0.15 (net of tax) .
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- CEO: “Carrier and coverage operations are now happening in one system… which will enable us to leverage our scale and realize future cost-of-purchased-transportation synergies… we now expect cash synergies to be more than $70 million.”
- CFO: “The slowdown in automotive volume represented a company-wide gross profit headwind of approximately $10 million year-over-year.”
- CSO: “We anticipate gross profit per load to improve in the second quarter… brokerage gross margin of between 13% and 15%.”
- CEO (on LTL share gains): “Revenue per load, excluding fuel and length of haul was flat… lowering price to get business, not in our playbook.”
- CFO (on COPT opportunity): “Combined brokerage transportation spend of about $4 billion in 2024. A 1% improvement in buy rates would represent a $40 million opportunity.”
Q&A Highlights
- Earnings power and mid-cycle progression: Management emphasized higher cross-cycle earnings power via buy-side synergies, scale, and productivity runway; a 1% COPT improvement equates to ~$40M .
- Q2 framework and assumptions: Guidance brackets reflect no sequential improvement from April at the high-end and worse volume/GP at the low-end; excludes material buy-side benefits from the May 1 migration .
- Tariff impacts and imports: Mixed customer responses (pull-forward vs pause), with sharp import declines from Asia potentially dampening truckload demand near-term .
- LTL share gains: Driven by ease-of-use tech and enterprise relationships; pricing discipline maintained (revenue per load flat ex fuel/LoH) .
- Cross-selling and synergy loads: Managed Transportation onboarding drives Brokerage synergy loads; additional OpEx and CapEx synergies outlined with high ROI (~$50M spend to generate $70M savings) .
Estimates Context
- Q1 2025 comparison to consensus: Revenue $1.433B vs $1.493B consensus (miss); adjusted diluted EPS $(0.03) vs $(0.017) consensus (miss); adjusted EBITDA $22M vs ~$22.7M consensus (in line). Values retrieved from S&P Global.
- Outlook: Q2 2025 guidance ($30–$40M EBITDA; Brokerage GM 13–15%) appears consistent with consensus EBITDA trending to low/mid-$30Ms; continued conservative framing given macro uncertainty and automotive headwinds . Values retrieved from S&P Global.
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Integration milestone is material: Single-platform carrier/coverage migration should unlock meaningful buy-side (COPT) savings starting in Q2 and scaling into H2 2025 .
- Synergies raised: Cash synergy target now >$70M (OpEx + CapEx), with additional COPT opportunity potentially as large or larger over time; high ROI with ~$50M cash outlay .
- Mix balancing the cycle: LTL strength (+26% volume) and Last Mile momentum (+24% stops) provide margin stability as TL remains soft; automotive weakness remains the key headwind .
- Estimates likely to adjust: Given Q1 revenue/EPS misses and cautious Q2 framing (shipper uncertainty, tariffs), expect near-term revisions focused on Brokerage GM and auto-exposed Managed Trans .
- Liquidity and leverage manageable: Cash $16M with $565M revolver capacity; net leverage 1.9x LTM bank-adjusted EBITDA provides flexibility for integration, working capital, and selective growth .
- Trading setup: Near-term catalysts include visible buy-side savings and cross-selling wins; downside risks centered on macro/tariff-induced demand softness and auto end-market .
- Medium-term thesis: As buy-side synergies materialize, contract rate increases phase in, and cycle normalizes, RXO’s earnings power should inflect higher given scale, technology, and cross-cycle FCF conversion .
Notes:
- No additional Q1 2025 press releases beyond the 8-K with Exhibit 99.1 were found .
- 10-Q provides cross-validation of Q1 financials and added disclosures on revenue by sector and legal contingencies .